01
The inventory cannot explain impact
Assets exist, but links between business services, applications and technical dependencies are missing or unreliable.
A useful CMDB answers who owns a service, what it depends on and what an incident affects. Avaratak builds service-first Atlassian Assets models that teams can maintain and actually use.
Service-first asset and configuration management
A configuration database is useful when service owners can trace which applications and infrastructure support a business service, what a change affects, and who needs to respond to an incident. An inventory full of disconnected objects cannot do that.
Avaratak designs Atlassian Assets around business services, relationships, clear ownership and sustainable data practices. We work backward from decisions the operations team needs to make.
Recognizable signals
01
Assets exist, but links between business services, applications and technical dependencies are missing or unreliable.
02
Changes, outages and lifecycle events expose data nobody is responsible for keeping current.
03
Object schemas and attributes have expanded without a working update process, integration design or data-quality checks.
How we work
The relationship model should help incident, change and request processes—not simply generate a prettier inventory.
Identify service owners, priority services, impact paths, escalation needs, relevant change records and the reports decision-makers require.
Model object types, attributes, ownership, references, lifecycle states and permissions. Keep the model as small as the use case allows.
Plan data imports or discovery sources, deduplication, synchronization and Jira Service Management fields or automation where the data improves action.
Walk real incidents and change scenarios, evaluate data completeness, establish review ownership and hand over maintenance and quality measures.
What you can hold us to
If the real need is a lightweight equipment register, contract inventory or ownership lookup, Assets can support a narrower model. We recommend the least complex structure that answers the questions people actually ask.
Evidence and deeper reading
Our published service-management case study covers an Assets CMDB designed around business services and used for incident response. The guide explains how to make schemas maintainable.
The questions that follow
No. It can represent business services, applications, vendors, facilities, contracts and other connected objects. The right schema depends on the questions the team needs answered.
Often. The work is to define quality, identifiers, ownership, update rules and relationship mapping before importing large volumes of inconsistent records.
No. Useful relationships and owners can improve impact analysis, but workflows, escalation and training must actually use the data.
Assign owners, define lifecycle/update triggers, review exceptions and measure the fields and relationships required for the intended decisions.
When it Matters, Bring in Avaratak
Bring one critical service, the questions you struggle to answer during incidents and the data sources you already have. We will discuss the smallest useful model and how to keep it accurate.
Map your first service